For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are the instructions how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.
Works (?) Thomas Girtin

The River Wensum at Norwich

1791 - 1792

Primary Image: TG0056: (?) Thomas Girtin (1775–1802), The River Wensum at Norwich, 1791–92, graphite and watercolour on laid paper, 32.4 × 47.6 cm, 12 ¾ × 18 ¾ in. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Rogers Fund, 1907 (07.283.4).

Photo courtesy of Metropolitan Museum of Art, Rogers Fund, 1907 (Public Domain)

Description
Creator(s)
(?) Thomas Girtin (1775-1802)
Title
  • The River Wensum at Norwich
Date
1791 - 1792
Medium and Support
Graphite and watercolour on laid paper
Dimensions
32.4 × 47.6 cm, 12 ¾ × 18 ¾ in
Inscription

'T. Girtin' lower right, by (?) Thomas Girtin (the signature has been cut, suggesting that it once extended onto an original mount which has been lost)

Object Type
Copy from an Unknown Source; Studio Watercolour
Subject Terms
City Life and Labour; East Anglia: Norfolk and Suffolk; River Scenery

Collection
Catalogue Number
TG0056
Description Source(s)
Viewed in May 2025

Provenance

Charles James Pooley (1836–1900); his sale, Christie’s, 6 March 1880, lot 27, unsold; his sale, Christie’s, 24 February 1888, lot 62 as 'A View in Norwich barges in river’, £10 6s; Sir John Charles Robinson (1824-1913); Christie's, 25 February 1907, lot 55; bought by 'Shepherd', £54 12s; Shepherd Brothers, London; bought from them by the Museum, 1907

Bibliography

Fry, 1907, pp.201–02; Carlisle, 1950, p.22

About this Work

This watercolour was bought in 1907 as by Girtin, but the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, has more recently demoted its status to ‘Anonymous British’ with the suggestion that the signature is forged.1 Thomas Girtin (1874–1960) and David Loshak did not include the work in their catalogue of Girtin’s watercolours (Girtin and Loshak, 1954), but the authors were not always kind to his apprenticeship works and it is perhaps time to revisit the possibility that this is indeed a very early work.

The most compelling point in favour of an attribution to Girtin is the signature, which, far from being an obvious forgery, resembles the form found on many of the works that Girtin produced during his apprenticeship to Edward Dayes (1763–1804), such as the interior view of St Stephen Walbrook (TG0014). The signature in the bottom right corner of this drawing has been cut at its lower edge and this probably resulted from the later removal of the original mount, onto which the writing had partly strayed. This form of presentation was typical of Girtin’s apprenticeship drawings, notably Rochester Castle, from the River Medway (TG0057). The biggest obstacle to an attribution to Girtin is the lack of comparable material since most of the surviving works from 1790–92 feature architectural subjects with an antiquarian interest and a working river with warehouses only subsequently featured in the artist's work sporadically (TG1649). Thus, whilst it is possible to believe that the poor perspective of the wall to the right and the schematic representation of the windows with their black infill might have been the result of the struggles of a very young artist working in an unfamiliar subject area, there are just a couple of few points of comparison that might help to substantiate the attribution. The pencil work on the wall to the right does indeed recall Girtin’s use of a broken line in areas of masonry, whilst the figures looking out from the upper part of the warehouse bear some resemblance to those in Rochester, from the River Medway (TG0015) which is signed and dated 1791. On balance, therefore, I am happy to reinstate Girtin’s name to the drawing, but given the paucity of the comparative material it is prefixed with a question mark. 

As for the subject, there is no suggestion that Girtin ever visited Norwich, unlike his master Dayes, who did indeed produce a number of depictions of the city from on-the-spot sketches. These invariably concentrate on the cathedral in contrast to the emphasis on the commercial activities of the city’s crowded waterways shown here, and it must be admitted that this is more typical of the views produced by Norwich’s native artists, such as John Crome (1768–1821), though no model has been found in their work either.2 Norwich was extremely well documents by both visitors and local artists and it is surprising that no image of a comparable scene on the river Wensum has been found. The work was described as showing Norwich at its earliest sale in 1880 and though the identification may be correct, another location may suggest why no source has been found.

1790

London: Interior of St Stephen Walbrook, Looking East

TG0014

(?) 1791

Rochester Castle, from the River Medway

TG0057

1800

The Ouse Bridge, York

TG1649

1791

Rochester, from the River Medway

TG0015

by Greg Smith

Place depicted

Footnotes

  1. 1 Andrew Wyld presumably thought that the signature was a forgery and suggested in a note on the work’s mount that it might be the work of Robert Dixon (1780–1815). However, I have not been able to find any close stylistic link with this watercolour and the younger artist’s depictions of Norwich.
  2. 2 A watercolour depicting another river scene, Bishop's Bridge, Norwich, still retains an attribution to Girtin (Harvard Art Museums/Fogg Museum, 1899.3). A young John Sell Cotman (1782–1842) would appear to be a more likely candidate for its authorship.

Revisions & Feedback

The website will be updated from time to time and, when changes are made, a PDF of the previous version of each page will be archived here for consultation and citation.

Please help us to improve this catalogue


If you have information, a correction or any other suggestions to improve this catalogue, please contact us.