Girtin produced a second set of hand-coloured impressions of his etchings, which were carefully mounted and sold by John Girtin to the dedicatee of the publication, George Capel-Coningsby, 5th Earl of Essex (1757–1839), for £50, though the whereabouts of this example is not known. The two sets have been the cause of considerable confusion, but, following the discovery of new evidence about John Girtin’s role in the project, it has been possible to distinguish their very different functions (Smith, 2017–18, pp.32–35). The set sold to the earl is thus complete, and it is carefully rendered and presented so as to resemble Girtin’s finished watercolours. In contrast, the group of eighteen hand-coloured etchings, which were once owned by Francis Russell, 7th Duke of Bedford (1788–1861), are very much working drawings; indeed, in some cases they have been cut down, presumably to disguise their careless treatment whilst in the studios of the four men who were employed by the Girtin brothers to add aquatint to the plates. The practical function of such drawings is also evident in the fact that, in addition to providing instructions to the professional aquatinter regarding the distribution of light and shade, they often include Girtin’s amendments, though these have been kept to a minimum in this case. What appears to be another coloured study by Girtin worked over his own etching is in the collection of the Yale Center for British Art (see figure 1). However, the unfinished state of the drawing strongly suggests that this is not the missing presentation drawing bought by the Earl of Essex.
Girtin’s viewpoint closely matches that adopted by Jean-Baptiste-François Génillion (1750–1829), whose view of the Pont Neuf was engraved for the Voyage Pittoresque de la France (see figure 2) (La Borde and others, 1781–1800). Girtin copied at least five watercolours from this source, and it is therefore likely that he knew this print of the Pont Neuf. However, if he based his view on the French prototype, he chose to respond to it by creating a very different foreground, so that, in stark contrast to the crowds of working men and women that populate the same area, Girtin created a more orderly scene in which elegantly dressed couples promenade, flanked by a troupe of well-turned-out cavalry. The latter was no doubt a reference to a nation on a war footing, but in no way could it have been construed as being critical of the French, and Girtin’s views of the Parisian quays are noticeably more refined than those found in the Voyage Pittoresque. The finished aquatints are, it should be noted, inscribed in both French and English, and there is no doubt that the Girtin brothers had hopes of selling prints to the French market, though this ambition was to come to nothing as hostilities between the two countries resumed a short time after the artist’s death.
1802
The Pont Neuf and the Mint: Pencil Study for Plate Eight of ‘Picturesque Views in Paris’
TG1874
1802
The Pont Neuf and the Mint: Pencil Study for Plate Eight of ‘Picturesque Views in Paris’
TG1874
About this Work