- Description
-
- Creator(s)
- John Opie (1761-1807)
- Title
-
- Portrait of Thomas Girtin
- Date
- 1800 - 1805
- Medium and Support
- Oil on canvas
- Dimensions
- 77 × 64 cm, 30 ¼ × 25 ¼ in
- Object Type
- Oil painting
- Subject Terms
- Portrait of Thomas Girtin
-
- Collection
- Catalogue Number
- TG1929
- Description Source(s)
- Viewed in 2001 and February 2020
Provenance
Mary Ann Girtin (née Borrett) (1781–1843); then by descent to Thomas Girtin (1874–1960); given to Tom Girtin (1913–94), c.1938; bequeathed to the Gallery, 1997
Exhibition History
London, 1875, no number; London, 1891b, no.286; London, 1906, no.291; London, 1933, no.44; Plymouth, 1957, no.69; London, 1962a, no.138; Arts Council, 1962, no.67; London, 2002, no.204
Bibliography
Thornbury, 1862, p.117; Rogers, 1878, p.97; Sparrow, 1902, p.81; Earland, 1911, p.278; Girtin and Loshak, 1954, p.219; Walker, 1985, vol.1, p.248
Footnotes
- 1 Hamilton, 2026, pp.10–11
Revisions & Feedback
The website will be updated from time to time and, when changes are made, a PDF of the previous version of each page will be archived here for consultation and citation.
Please help us to improve this catalogue
If you have information, a correction or any other suggestions to improve this catalogue, please contact us.
About this Work
The portrait of one artist by another performed a wide range of functions at this time. Many were produced from motives of friendship and professional solidarity, and the oil sketch by John Opie (1761–1807) on which this work is based (TG1930) may fit into this category, as does the drawing by Henry Edridge (1768–1821) that shows Girtin sketching (TG1923). This larger finished oil is a more formal commissioned piece, however, perhaps made for Girtin’s family, with whom it remained for almost two hundred years. The work is not dated, and it is therefore possible that it was commissioned after the artist’s death as a memorial. The other versions of the composition, perhaps numbering as many as five in all (including TG1924 and TG1931), fall into another category again. Some were presumably made after the artist’s death and were probably ordered from Opie by Girtin’s patrons. They were therefore part of the process by which the artist’s posthumous reputation was established, a role that was also performed by this work when it was reproduction in mezzotint by Samuel William Reynolds (1773–1835). This was published by the artist’s brother, John Girtin (1773–1821), in 1817 as a ‘Portrait of the late extraordinary Artist, Thomas Girtin’ (see the print after, above), and this was the image by which Girtin was known throughout the nineteenth century until the acquisition of another version of this composition by the National Portrait Gallery in 1891 (TG1924).
If Opie’s portrait was painted posthumously, it offers no hint of impending mortality; indeed, the slightly open mouth suggests that the artist is engaged in conversation even as he works. Early biographical accounts of the artist stress his sociable nature and how his painting room ‘was the resort of many persons of distinction in society’ and a place where, ‘surrounded by callers, the artist would go on with his work, chatting and telling anecdotes at the same time; liberal, as on all occasions, of his knowledge of art’ (Roget, 1891, pp.109–10). In spite of all this, the painting conforms to the notion of the Romantic artist in one respect. Opie thus concentrated exclusively on the artist’s face, and the tools of his trade are reduced to two ambiguous slashes of paint, one of which represents a porte crayon and the other either a sketchbook or a palette. In this context, Girtin’s intense gaze signifies an artist blessed with a superior imagination whose labour is intellectual rather than manual.
Something of this quality has been perceived in the face of a man found under an oil painting of an unidentified castle amongst mountains by Girtin’s contemporary Joseph Mallord William Turner (1775–1851) (see figure 1). Revealed by x-radiography, the ghostly image of the lost portrait, evidently not completed, has been tentatively identified as depicting Girtin (Breen, Townsend and Warrell, 2020, pp.86–88). The thought that Turner portrayed his friend, perhaps even as a memorial following his death in November 1802, is an attractive idea not least as Turner's early biographer Walter Thornbury recorded that he had 'painted his friend Girtin’s portrait in oil' (Thornbury, 1862, vol.1, p.28, p.117). Nonetheless, the visual evidence to my eye is not ultimately conclusive.
The fact that Opie painted portraits of Girtin amongst other artists has been used by James Hamilton to further his case that the distinguished image of Turner in the Turner Bequest (Tate, N00458) is not a self portrait as has been generally assumed.1 Hamilton makes a compelling case for Opie’s authorship and in passing adds the intriguing suggestion that the work may have been the ‘Portrait of an artist’ that was shown at the Royal Academy exhibition in 1798 (no.198). However, Girtin’s links to Opie are somewhat better documented than Turner's and arguably it is his portrait that is the more realistic candidate for the 1798 exhibit. If this was the case then we would have to look again at the dating of Opie's portraits, though currently there is nothing more to substantiate the case for either Turner or Girtin as the subject of the exhibit.
1800 - 1801
Sketch of Thomas Girtin’s Head
TG1930
(?) 1801
Thomas Girtin Sketching
TG1923
1800 - 1805
Portrait of Thomas Girtin
TG1924
1800 - 1805
Portrait of Thomas Girtin
TG1931
1800 - 1805
Portrait of Thomas Girtin
TG1924