- Description
-
- Creator(s)
- (?) Thomas Girtin (1775-1802)
- Title
-
- An Ornamental Ruin in a Park; A Tree on a Mound
- Date
- 1796 - 1797
- Medium and Support
- Graphite and watercolour on laid paper
- Dimensions
- 23.5 × 33.2 cm, 9 ¼ × 13 in
- Object Type
- Studio Watercolour
- Subject Terms
- The Landscape Park; Unidentified Topographical View
-
- Collection
- Catalogue Number
- TG1587
- Girtin & Loshak Number
- 233 as 'Ornamental Ruin in a Park' by Thomas Girtin; '1797-8'
- Description Source(s)
- Viewed in 2001 and 2018
Provenance
Alexander T. Hollingsworth (c.1848–1929); his posthumous sale, Christie’s, 19 April 1929, lot 49 as 'A Landscape, with ruins'; bought by 'Leggatt', £68 5s; Frederick John Nettlefold (1867–1949) by 1935; presented to the Museum, 1948
Bibliography
Grundy, 1933–38, vol.2, pp.130–31
Revisions & Feedback
The website will be updated from time to time and, when changes are made, a PDF of the previous version of each page will be archived here for consultation and citation.
Please help us to improve this catalogue
If you have information, a correction or any other suggestions to improve this catalogue, please contact us.
About this Work
Although Thomas Girtin (1874–1960) and David included this view of an unidentified ornamental ruin in their catalogue and dated it to 1797–98, I have long doubted its attribution to Girtin on the grounds of quality (Girtin and Loshak, 1954, p.165). It is possible that the work’s faded condition has dealt harshly with the large areas of foliage in particular, flattening out the forms to create an undifferentiated mass of too-dominant earth tones, but the work has not suffered to the same degree as many, and this cannot account for its poor perspective. Girtin’s depiction of architectural subjects is one of his greatest strengths, and, though his perspective could on occasion go awry, in general he displayed an understanding of both the structural logic of buildings and their decorative details. This is not remotely evident in the bizarre construction shown here, in no known style and depicting what Girtin and Loshak define as ‘bastard architecture’ (Girtin and Loshak, 1954, p.165). Ironically, the unfinished and presumably abandoned view on the back, showing a tree on a mound with figures, is of a higher quality, but likewise there is nothing in its handling to make a compelling case for Girtin as the author, though the composition does resemble the view of Hawarden Castle (TG1350).
(?) 1798
Hawarden Castle
TG1350