For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are the instructions how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.
Works Thomas Girtin

All Saints' Church, Marlow

1792 - 1793

Primary Image: TG0237: Thomas Girtin (1775–1802), All Saints' Church, Marlow, 1792–93, graphite and watercolour on wove paper, 20.8 × 27.6 cm, 8 ³⁄₁₆ × 10 ¾ in. The Whitworth, The University of Manchester (D.1892.74).

Photo courtesy of The Whitworth, The University of Manchester, Photo by Michael Pollard (All Rights Reserved)

Description
Creator(s)
Thomas Girtin (1775-1802)
Title
  • All Saints' Church, Marlow
Date
1792 - 1793
Medium and Support
Graphite and watercolour on wove paper
Dimensions
20.8 × 27.6 cm, 8 ³⁄₁₆ × 10 ¾ in
Inscription

‘T. Girtin’ lower centre, by Thomas Girtin (the signature has been cut, suggesting that it once extended onto an original mount which has been lost)

Object Type
Studio Watercolour
Subject Terms
Buckinghamshire View; Gothic Architecture: Parish Church; River Scenery

Collection
Catalogue Number
TG0237
Girtin & Loshak Number
141ii as 'Great Marlow Church, Bucks'; '1795–6'
Description Source(s)
Viewed in 2001 and February 2020

Provenance

John Edward Taylor (1830–1905); presented to the Whitworth Institute, 1892

Exhibition History

Manchester, 1894, no number, as 'Henley Church, on the Thames'; Reading, 1968, no.22; Manchester, 1973, no.46

Bibliography

Girtin and Loshak, 1954, p.57; Nugent, 2003, p.132

About this Work

This early signed watercolour, probably dating from the first year after the termination of Girtin’s apprenticeship to Edward Dayes (1763–1804), is ultimately based on a composition by the master (see TG0271 figure 1) from which derived two identical pencil drawings (TG0249 and TG0271). Although Girtin was now independent from Dayes and therefore free to travel, the costs involved were no doubt prohibitive and he appears to have continued to look to the work of other artists for the basis of his topographical compositions. Despite his having produced a series of views of Marlow on the Thames, particularly its riverside church, there is no evidence that he ever visited the town. The process of developing a composition from a secondary source was far from straightforward, however, as comparisons between Girtin’s watercolour, his two pencil drawings (TG0249 and TG0271) and the watercolour of the same composition by Dayes indicate. Thus, although each follows the same composition, there are significant variations suggesting that they all have a common prototype but that at every stage changes were introduced. For instance, Girtin’s watercolour dispenses with the trees in the foreground that are a feature of the pencil drawings and Dayes’ watercolour, whilst retaining the rivercraft, which appear solely in the drawings. In turn, Girtin’s watercolour omits the confused mingling of trees and buildings to the right of the drawings, as well as the Gothic detailing of the buildings in the same area in Dayes’ watercolour, introducing in the place of the latter a picturesque gable that is detached from the church. My thesis is that the pencil drawings probably followed the lost prototype closely and that the differences between the watercolours by Dayes and Girtin reflect the different ways in which they adjusted the composition to form a satisfactory outcome. The manner in which Dayes’ watercolour follows the church’s architectural details with greater fidelity reflects both the fact that he could interpret his own drawing with greater certainty (as he had been to the location depicted) and the fact that Girtin was more fundamentally concerned with the picturesque possibilities opened up by the subject. The attraction of the motif lay, in other words, in the way in which the vernacular and the sacred were conflated.

Girtin’s other early view of All Saints’ Church can be dated to 1791, whilst Girtin was still apprenticed to Dayes (TG0054). It is smaller in scale and clearly does not form a pair with this view, which, with its greater mastery of perspective and more sophisticated handling of the watercolour medium, would appear to date from a year or so later. One of the drawings Girtin made is known to have come from the collection of the antiquarian James Moore (1762–99), whose early patronage was crucial in establishing the artist’s career after his apprenticeship. This work displays no great interest in the antiquarian, and it was more likely aimed at the market for picturesque subjects, where the precise identity of the subject was less significant. It is not surprising, therefore, that for many years it laboured under the erroneous title of ‘Henley’.

1792 - 1793

All Saints’ Church, Marlow

TG0249

1792 - 1793

All Saints’ Church, Marlow

TG0271

1792 - 1793

All Saints’ Church, Marlow

TG0249

1792 - 1793

All Saints’ Church, Marlow

TG0271

(?) 1791

Marlow, from across the River Thames

TG0054

by Greg Smith

Place depicted

Revisions & Feedback

The website will be updated from time to time and, when changes are made, a PDF of the previous version of each page will be archived here for consultation and citation.

Please help us to improve this catalogue


If you have information, a correction or any other suggestions to improve this catalogue, please contact us.